49/ 50
＋ Best follows the required wording and provides the full quote.
－ The conclusion and explanation overlap slightly, but harmlessly.
AI Grounding Prompt
1. Base your answer ONLY on the uploaded documents.
| Category | Using AI › Source-grounded AI |
|---|---|
| Tags | ReviewingAnalyzingSummarizing |
1. Base your answer ONLY on the uploaded documents. Nothing else. 2. If info isn't found, say "Not found." Don't guess. 3. For each claim, cite: [Document, Page/Section, Quote] 4. If uncertain, mark as [Unverified] 5. [Your question] Re-scan the document. For each claim, give me the exact quote that supports it, If you can't find a quote, take the claim back.
What this prompt does
Useful for document-grounded Q&A where guessing should be minimized and citations enforced. It tells the model to answer “Not found” when information is absent and retract claims without quotes.
Model comparison
Gemini is strongest in format, evidence, and length. ChatGPT is concise but misses the required phrase and full quote, while Claude is specific but unnecessarily long.
44/ 50
＋ Concise and precise about the gap between periods and months.
－ Omits the required “Not found.” and truncates the quotation.
39/ 50
＋ Explicitly retracts the two-month claim and cites support.
－ Irrelevant notes and an external assumption make it too long.
| Criterion | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 7 | 8 | 10 | Gemini +25% |
| Accuracy | 9 | 8 | 10 | Gemini +11% |
| Specificity | 9 | 9 | 10 | Gemini +11% |
| Structure | 9 | 8 | 9 | Tie |
| Right length | 10 | 6 | 10 | Tie |
Scored 1–10 by gpt-5.6-sol with model names hidden (2026-09-24). This is an AI review, not a measurement.
Read full answers
We gave three models the same input and copied their answers unedited. Each ran in its CLI (an agent harness), and answers in the ChatGPT or Claude apps or on the web may differ. Outputs are in Korean.
[Pasted material] [첨부 문서: 오피스텔 전세 임대차계약서 발췌] 제4조(계약의 해지) 임차인이 2기의 차임액에 달하도록 연체하거나 제10조의 사용·관리 의무를 위반한 경우 임대인은 계약을 해지할 수 있다. 제7조(보증금의 반환) 임대인은 임대차 종료 시 임차인으로부터 목적물을 인도받음과 동시에 보증금을 반환하여야 한다. 다만 연체 임대료 등 채무가 있는 경우 이를 공제하고 반환한다. 질문: 이 계약서에서 임대인이 계약을 해지할 수 있는 임차인의 연체 조건은 정확히 몇 개월분 차임인가요?
정확한 개월 수는 찾을 수 없습니다.
계약서에는 “2기의 차임액에 달하도록 연체”라고만 되어 있으며, 이를 개월 수로 명시하지 않았습니다.
[오피스텔 전세 임대차계약서 발췌, 제4조(계약의 해지), “임차인이 2기의 차임액에 달하도록 연체하거나…”]
[Unverified] “2기”가 정확히 몇 개월을 의미하는지는 문서에 없습니다.
More in this category
| Find where your sources disagree | |
| Report what your sources cannot answer | |
| Build an outline from your sources | |
| Design questions worth asking a grounded tool | |
| Trace a claim back to the passage |