+ Presents ten specific questions covering all key discovery areas.
- Lists all questions at once instead of adapting turn by turn.
Design a conversational process to create a minimal logo for the user's project, leveraging their branding colors: #3a7eab, #cf4832, and #d1d3d4.
| Category | Design › Product design |
|---|---|
| Tags | Question generationIdeationCreator |
Design a conversational process to create a minimal logo for the user's project, leveraging their branding colors: #3a7eab, #cf4832, and #d1d3d4. Begin by developing a set of 10 thoughtful yes/no questions to clarify the project's goals, target audience, aesthetics, and design preferences. After receiving responses, assess if further detail is needed—if so, continue asking focused yes/no follow-up questions until sufficient clarity about the project's nature and user’s expectations is achieved. Only once all required information has been gathered, generate a detailed logo concept brief using the collected answers as reasoning steps.
Request and Reasoning Order:
- All reasoning, deduction, and rationale for logo direction must be documented before the final conclusion.
- The final conclusion (logo brief/concept) must always appear after the reasoning.
- If providing examples, always show Q&A (reasoning) before the final logo concept.
Process Steps:
- Start by explaining the goal (creating a minimal logo using the specified branding colors).
- Present 10 sequential, thoughtful yes/no questions, designed to uncover essential details (e.g., project field, mood, geometric/organic shapes, initialism use, target audience, etc.).
- After each set of answers, assess what is unclear. Ask direct, relevant follow-up yes/no questions as needed for ambiguous or incomplete information.
- Once all important criteria are clarified, summarize the reasoning that leads to your logo design proposal (list the answers, state the key takeaways, explain how these shape your suggestions).
- Provide the minimal logo concept as the final output—describe it visually (not as an image), using concise, clear language, referencing the chosen colors and tying the concept to the reasoning steps.
Output Format:
- Converse in turn-by-turn, always basing next questions on previous answers until enough is known.
- At the end of the Q&A phase, output a JSON object with two main fields:
- "reasoning_steps": An ordered list outlining each answer and what was deduced.
- "logo_concept": A single clear paragraph describing the proposed minimal logo (visual elements, shapes, color usage, and rationale).
Example (shortened for illustration; real exchanges may be longer and more complex):
Sample Q&A Exchange:
Q1: Is your project related to technology?
A1: Yes.
Q2: Is your brand's mood more playful than serious?
A2: No.
... (continue with more questions and follow-ups as needed)
Final Output Example:
{
"reasoning_steps": [
"The project is tech-related: suggests clean, structured symbols.",
"Mood is serious: favors sharp lines and minimal, non-playful forms.",
"Prefers geometric over organic shapes: will use strict geometry.",
"Wants initials included: will consider stylized lettering."
//... further reasoning as relevant
],
"logo_concept": "A minimal logo using the initials in a geometric, interlocked arrangement. The primary color #3a7eab forms the base, with accent lines in #cf4832 and subtle highlights in #d1d3d4. The design is crisp and serious, reflecting the tech context and brand tone."
}
Important:
- All reasoning and interim thinking must be shown before the final logo concept (conclusion).
- Persist with follow-up questions if key information is missing or ambiguous.
- Be clear, concise, and visual in the final descriptive paragraph (logo_concept).
---
Important Reminder:
Persistently gather project information via yes/no questions, show your reasoning before giving a logo concept, and always follow the output JSON structure.This procedural prompt narrows logo direction through yes/no questions before proposing a concept. The final output is constrained to a JSON object with reasoning_steps and logo_concept.
Gemini best fulfills the ten-question discovery process and next steps. ChatGPT starts appropriately but asks only one question, while [C] is absent.
+ Presents ten specific questions covering all key discovery areas.
- Lists all questions at once instead of adapting turn by turn.
+ Clearly states the goal and colors, then opens the dialogue.
- Provides only one of the required ten questions, leaving the task incomplete.
| Criterion | ChatGPT | Gemini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 4 | 9 | Gemini +125% |
| Accuracy | 9 | 9 | Tie |
| Specificity | 6 | 9 | Gemini +50% |
| Structure | 8 | 9 | Gemini +13% |
| Right length | 5 | 9 | Gemini +80% |
Scored 1–10 by gpt-5.6-sol with model names hidden (2026-09-25). This is an AI review, not a measurement.
We gave three models the same input and copied their answers unedited. Each ran in its CLI (an agent harness), and answers in the ChatGPT or Claude apps or on the web may differ. Outputs are in Korean.
목표는 프로젝트의 성격과 기대하는 인상을 파악한 뒤, 브랜드 색상 #3a7eab, #cf4832, #d1d3d4를 활용해 간결하고 기억하기 쉬운 미니멀 로고를 만드는 것입니다.
Q1. 프로젝트는 기술·디지털 분야와 관련이 있나요?
예/아니오로 답해주세요.
| 7v7 Football Team Generator App | |
| Accessibility Auditor | |
| Accessibility Auditor Agent Role | |
| Accessibility Expert | |
| Accessibility Testing Superpower |