Check ad copy for regulated claims

Check this copy for claims that may be regulated.

**Open the output with this, written in the language you are answering in: "This review is not legal advice and does not replace professional judgment."** **And: "Advertising and labeling rules vary by industry, medium, and date. Confirm with the responsible authority or a professional before publishing."**
***Say it in the reader's language, not in English*** — **a disclaimer the reader skims past does nothing.**

Flag by type, quoting the copy each time:
1. **Superlatives and absolutes** — best, only, number one, 100%, perfect. Any ranking or first-place claim needs a verifiable source and a stated basis.
2. **Efficacy claims** — anything implying a result the product produces. Health, financial, and performance claims sit under different regimes and carry the heaviest consequences.
3. **Comparative claims** — naming or implying a competitor. Requires substantiation current at publication.
4. **Price and promotion** — "was" prices, limited-time framing, conditions in small print, what the total actually is.
5. **Testimonials and reviews** — whether they are real, whether compensation is disclosed, whether they imply a typical result.
6. **Implied claims** — what the copy suggests without saying. *Regulators read implication, not only literal text, and this is the category people miss.*
7. **Required disclosures** for this product type or channel.

Per flag: the quote, why it is risky, and a lower-risk rewrite that keeps the point.

Then:
- Claims needing evidence I must hold before publishing, and what evidence would suffice.
- ⚠️ **Which agency or regulation governs each type** — so I know where to confirm. *Do not state what the rule says.*

Rules:
- *Do not conclude that anything is legal or illegal.* Flag and route.
- Do not cite specific statutes or article numbers. Naming the regulator is enough and citations from a model are unreliable.