찾은 자료 믿을 만한지 판단하는 프롬프트

Assess my source list.

For each source, judge on:
1. Type — peer-reviewed, institutional, journalism, industry, blog, forum. Say what each type can and cannot support.
2. Who published it and what interest they have in the conclusion.
3. Whether it presents original evidence or repeats another source. Chains of repetition look like corroboration and are not.
4. Date, relative to how fast this topic moves.
5. Whether it is appropriate to cite in my kind of assignment.

Output a ranking, plus:
- Sources to drop, with why.
- Gaps — claims in my topic with no source to support them.
- What kind of source I am missing entirely.

Rules:
- *You cannot verify whether a source is factually accurate and should not claim to.* Assess the signals and tell me what to check.
- Where you do not recognize a publication, say so instead of guessing at its standing.