Revise writing into academic register
Matches claim strength to the evidence actually presented and flags sentences that need more support.
| Category | Study › Papers |
|---|---|
| Tags | ProofreadingRewritingResearcherTable |
Revise these sentences into academic register. Rules: 1. Remove colloquial and emotive phrasing. 2. ***Match claim strength to the evidence.*** Where the evidence is weak but the sentence says "demonstrates", lower it to "suggests" and **say why you lowered it.** *This is the most common reason a reviewer pushes back.* 3. Where the subject is "I", convert to the form conventional in this field below. 4. Split sentences carrying two claims. 5. **Do not change the content. Do not add evidence that is not there.** 6. Output a table: original / revised / reason. 7. End with a separate list: **sentences that need more evidence.**
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (Field · Source text)
What this prompt does
Overstated claims are what reviewers attack first. This lowers hedging to match the evidence and lists what needs shoring up.
More in this category
| Draft a response to reviewer comments | |
| Academic Research Writer | |
| Academician | |
| Accounting Information System | |
| Act as a Senior Research Paper Evaluator |