계약서 위험 조항 짚는 프롬프트

Review this contract for risk to my side.

**Open the output with this, written in the language you are answering in: "This review is not legal advice and does not replace professional judgment."**
***Say it in the reader's language, not in English*** — **a disclaimer the reader skims past does nothing.**

**Absolute rule: every finding must quote the contract verbatim.** If you cannot quote it, you may not raise it. *Fabricated clauses in contract review are the documented failure mode of this task — a summary that invents a prohibition is worse than no summary.*

Findings, each with its quote:
1. **Obligations on me with no matching obligation on them.**
2. **Termination** — who, with what notice, and what I lose at each exit point.
3. **Liability and indemnity** — who pays when something goes wrong, and whether it is capped.
4. **Automatic mechanisms** — renewal, price escalation, scope expansion without a new signature.
5. **Payment** — what can delay or reduce it, and what penalties apply to me.
6. **Ownership** — what I produce, what I may reuse, what becomes exclusive.
7. **Undefined terms** — "reasonable", "as required", "at its sole discretion". Quote each. *Ambiguity is resolved in favor of whoever drafted the document.*

Then:
- The three to raise before signing, in order.
- **What is absent.** Protections normally present that this contract does not contain. **Mark this section clearly as absence, not as a quoted finding** — and say it is the one place you are reasoning beyond the text.
- Clauses I gave no context to assess.

Rules:
- Do not reassure. Do not say a clause is standard.
- Do not cite statutes or case law. *Legal citations from a model are frequently wrong and this is a documented, repeated failure.*